A MERGER between Great Lakes Council and Gloucester Shire Council looks unfeasible, following the release of an independent report.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Compiled by consultants Morrison Low, the report indicates that a merger with its neighbouring shire would have a significant negative financial impact.
The report considered the implications, benefits and drawbacks of a merger and whether or not is should be supported or rejected.
This conclusion accords with Great Lakes Council’s preferred position, which is to remain as an independent council for the time being.
- Great Lakes Council general manager Glen Handford
“Morrison Low found that there would be significant financial shortfalls at the inception of a merger. These shortfalls would not improve over time. In fact, the findings show that the merged councils would have a deteriorating financial position in the future. At this time, a merger would not be feasible,” Great Lakes Council’s general manager Glenn Handford, said.
The report concluded that merging the two councils would not produce efficiencies or savings necessary to offset the cost of a merger.
“This conclusion accords with Great Lakes Council’s preferred position, which is to remain as an independent council for the time being,” Mr Handford said.
The report on the viability of the merger was commissioned by both Great Lakes and Gloucester Shire Councils in response to the Independent Local Government Review Panel’s recommendation that Gloucester consider merging with either Great Lakes or Greater Taree.
Both councils agreed to look at the case for a merger on the recommendation of the (ILGRP).
The full report has been placed on public exhibition and can be viewed on the Great Lakes Council website. Submissions will be received until 4.30pm on June 5.
