GREEN Point residents are bracing themselves for change after developers were yesterday given the go ahead to submit plans for the village.
Great Lakes Council voted 5-4 to rezone parts of Green Point for urban development. The decision is bound by some conditions. New land lots must be bigger than 600 square metres, and an area master plan will be drawn up with input from a Green Point residents’ group.
A packed gallery at the council meeting was dotted with Save Green Point t-shirts. Mayor John Chadban announced the decision to applause from one or two people and quiet heckling from the majority.
“At the end of the day the NSW Department of Planning is always looking over council’s shoulder and will have the final say,” he said.
“There’s a long way to go and I think there’s a genuine wish from both sides to work in close consultation.”
The gallery’s responses varied from “What just happened? We lost?” to “Shame on you”.
Green Point Community Association’s Margaret Blackwood was disappointed but optimistic.
“The decision’s left us in no man’s land, but it does promise closer consultation,” she said.
“I put a lot of faith into that promise [of community involvement]. Some of the councillors who spoke today were very much in our favour.”
As the rezoning was debated, CrJohn Weate explained why he would vote against it.
“It’s easy to be cynical and think Green Point residents don’t want anyone else there, and it’s unfair to say ‘we have houses in a beautiful area, but young families can’t’” he said.
“But this decision is about sustainability. If we propose extending our development footprint, there’d better be a good argument. Filling a low-lying floodplain with 600 sq m urban blocks doesn’t seem sustainable.”
Cr Leigh Vaughan echoed his sentiments.
“After the barrage of letters and emails we’ve had from residents it’s tempting to think residents just oppose anyone else coming into the village. However, council has to be satisfied with the environmental impact of this rezoning, and I still remember the problems caused at Jimmy’s Beach. I’m not satisfied with this motion.”
Mayor Chadban criticised the opposing councillors.
“I’m absolutely staggered at what I just heard. In 1995 Cr Weate agreed to rezone the land from Rural [classification], with reason to believe all along it would later be open to urban development,” he said.
“All of Forster and Tuncurry are built on filled and drained land. It’s been acknowledged there are drainage and groundwater issues, but we’ve been told by experts these issues can be managed. That’s the expert information, not the emotional information.”
Deputy mayor Jan McWilliams accused some councillors of grandstanding.
“At the risk of putting myself offside with some of the other councillors, I think it’s worth remembering this is an election year. And no I don’t have to turn around and play to the gallery,” she said as the audience murmured.
Earlier, Green Point’s Jan Armstrong and Trevor Cooper read submissions opposing the rezoning. They claimed development would expose the village to flooding, stormwater runoff, increased fire danger and loss of character. The claims were refuted by developer Hardie Holdings’ Jamie Boswell and consultant Brian Lidbury.